Friday, May 16, 2014

UG Applies for Federal Transportation Funding

Over the last century or so, we have built an impressive network of highways, roads, bridges and tunnels here in the United States.

This infrastructure has given us tremendous freedom to drive our cars and trucks just about anywhere we want to go.


But there are a couple of down sides to all that construction...

(1) It's tremendously expensive to maintain and improve all the transportation infrastructure we've already built (even as we continue to build more).

(2) The increasing number of cars and trucks on our streets and highways has contributed to a couple of unwanted problems:
  • traffic congestion can create bottlenecks and make travel frustrating and difficult.
  • engine emissions can increase pollution and decrease air quality, especially in larger urban areas.


Every year the Federal Government allocates federal tax dollars to fund local transportation projects across the United States that seek to fix or improve those two problems. These funds are primarily allocated through three different programs:
  • Surface Transportation Program (STP)
  • Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ)
  • Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)

Each program approaches the transportation puzzle and problems from a little different angle:

Surface Transportation Program (STP)
Supports projects to preserve and improve the conditions and performance on any Federal-aid highway, bridge and tunnel projects on any public road, pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, and transit capital projects, including intercity bus terminals.

Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ)
Supports projects and other related efforts that contribute to air quality improvements and provide congestion relief on roadways.

Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)
Supports projects that help increase transportation choices and access, enhance the built and natural environment and the transportation experience, and provide a sense of place.

In the Kansas City area, the Mid-America Regional Council (MARC) is the designated "metropolitan planning organization" that collects and evaluates proposals from local governments to use funds from the various transportation programs.

This is a competitive grant process as there are many more potential projects than there are dollars to fund them.

One part of MARC's overall selection process is getting public input on the proposed projects. MARC is currently asking for public opinion for projects nominated by local governments in the metro. The Unified Government submitted 9 projects applications, (see list below).

I invite everyone to click the link below, learn more about the proposed projects and submit comments if you wish.

MARC Transportation Department - 2014 Call for Projects
(Instructions: Click above link; Sort by Organization; Select Unified Government; Select Project. A window showing a summary of the application will appear for your information. Scroll down to the bottom of the page to submit your input. You may provide comments to one or all of the projects).

Unified Government – List of Project Applications
  • Bus Route 107 – Southern Extension (CMAQ)
  • Bus Route 107 Bus Stop/Station Improvements (STP)
  • 12th & 10th Street Bikeway, Metropolitan to Quindaro (CMAQ & STP)
  • Central Ave and 18th Street Intersection (CMAQ & STP)
  • Leavenworth Road Modernization, 63rd to 38th (STP)
  • Minnesota Ave 9th to 5th (STP)
  • Safe Routes KCK Phase D: TE Edison, Midland Trail & Hazel Grove (TAP)
  • Safe Routes KCK Phase E: Rushton, White and Noble Prentis (TAP)
  • Safe Routes KCK Walking School Bus Expansion (TAP)

Have a great weekend!
~ Brian

bmckiernan@wycokck.org
- or -
Suggestion Box



Monday, May 12, 2014

Celebrate National Bike Month with RevolveKCK

May is celebrated across the country as "National Bike Month". The month-long celebration is sponsored by The League of American Bicyclists.

According to the official National Bike Month web page, National Bike Month was established in 1956 and is "a chance to showcase the many benefits of bicycling — and encourage more folks to giving biking a try."

The web page continues, "Whether you bike to work or school; ride to save money or time; pump those pedals to preserve your health or the environment; or simply to explore your community, National Bike Month is an opportunity to celebrate the unique power of the bicycle and the many reasons we ride."


We are blessed here in Kansas City, Kansas to have two great non-profit organizations who make it their mission to empower young and old alike through the power of cycling. One of them is Revolve KCK and they are about to celebrate the one year anniversary of the opening of their KCK location at 554 Central Avenue.



And what better way to mark an anniversary than with a gigantic National Bike Month party and fundraiser?


Mark this Saturday (May 17, 2014) on your calendar and plan to join everyone at 554 Central starting at 2:00 p.m. for the RevolveKCK Bike Month Fundraiser with Trio Aztlan & Iron Sunshine!

I'm sure it will be a great time. Hope to see you there!
~ Brian

bmckiernan@wycokck.org
- or -
Suggestion Box


Thursday, May 1, 2014

Bits and Bytes of "Open Data"

I attended a presentation at the Google Fiber Space about a week ago that touched on the concept of "open data". This is something we've been talking about quite a bit lately within the Unified Government.

Governments (whether local, state or national) generate, collect, store and analyze tons of data. Many tons of data.

This includes data on things like property values, zoning areas, business licenses, property taxes, sales taxes, budget income and expenditures, building code violations, bus routes and ridership, trash collection routes, streets plowed, crimes committed, fires fought and much, much, much more.

Some of that information (data) is written on paper and filed in drawers and cabinets in offices throughout all our buildings. Other data are stored on computer, but in a huge variety of locations and formats (word processing document, spreadsheet, database, PDF, etc.).



A good deal of that information (data) is "public". This means that any citizen can request to see a report on the data at any time.

Socrata is a company that creates and markets products for "opening" government and business data. In a recent email, they offered the following definition and explanation:

"Open Data is making available any and all data and information that could be acquired through a 'Freedom of Information' request.

"Forward-thinking governments have discovered that opening public data helps them to set smarter program goals, more accurately gauge performance, and improve citizen engagement.

"Whether through self-service apps for citizens, faster reporting, or more efficient data management, open data gives public-sector organizations the ability to automate processes that once consumed thousands of staff hours and millions of tax dollars."


The Sunlight Foundation is another organization dedicated to the concept of "open data". Their web site says:

"Most government information disclosure laws and systems currently in place, including right-to-know, freedom of information and public records laws, are vehicles for reactive disclosure. Reactive disclosure means that a question has to be asked before an answer is given and that public information must be requested before it is disclosed. Proactive disclosure is the opposite. Proactive disclosure is the release of public information before an individual requests it. In the 21st century that means proactively putting new information online, where people are looking for it." (emphasis added)

Aaahhh...putting data online. I'm a big computer nerd and a card carrying "data guy". I'm a *huge* proponent of open data as a step toward transparency and toward solving community challenges, but I worry that "opening" the government's mountain of data and proactively putting it online is going to be tougher (and more expensive) than it sounds.



For example, how do we store all our data in a way that will still be accessible and readable in a few years or a few decades? (How many of you thought you were storing family memories for a lifetime when you recorded them on Betamax video cassettes?)

Or, how expensive will it be to build the electronic computer networks that make data available online and on demand 24 / 7 / 365? When there is a real, physical infrastructure of streets, sidewalks and sewers that is decades old and falling apart, how many tax dollars should any government be spending to "proactively" put data online?

I don't have any answers, but I've certainly been giving this a lot of thought lately.

Besides the cost, even our best electronic infrastructure can be quite temperamental. All of the cool technology in the world is useless if there is a power outage or if a hardware or software bug breaks the connection between people and data.

For example, here's the message I got on my phone this morning when I pulled up the Transit app that is highlighted below.




D'oh! Everything cleared up quickly and I got my data after just a moment's delay, but it illustrates that it's not all rainbows and unicorns in "open data land" and we have a continuing challenge ahead of us to provide useful and reliable data to all of our stakeholders at the lowest possible cost.

Even though it's not yet centralized or in a common format, a lot of the data we collect in the Unified Government is already "open" and available to citizens. Our staff are working on a webpage that collects all the links to our various online databases and resources. In the meantime, here is a listing of some of the more commonly accessed data sites within the UG.

DotMaps
http://www.wycokck.org/dotmaps

According to the opening page of the web site:
"DotMaps is an interactive Web map service covering Wyandotte County, Kansas (which includes the cities of Kansas City, Kansas, Bonner Springs, Edwardsville, and City of Lake Quivira).

"DotMaps is your information guide to geographic features like real estate parcels, streets, landmarks, rivers, streams, etc."

Here's a screenshot of DotMaps showing the various
real estate "parcels" around City Hall.
Parcels is just one of many overlays that can be displayed on a map.

LANDS WEB ~ Real Estate Search
http://www.wycokck.org/landsweb

According to the opening page of this web site:
"This new Web-Access site will provide Wyandotte County Real Estate Tax Roll and Appraisal Information on the following inquiries:
  • Parcel, Address (All Users) & Ownership (Subscribers Only)
  • Taxes & Special Assessments
  • Property Descriptions and Values
  • Levies & Tax Districts
  • Residential Property Characteristics"
The opening screen of LANDS WEB
has explanations of what data is available
and how to access the database.
Here's a sample report on one "parcel" of land.
This happens to be City Hall, but every other parcel
in Wyandotte County is included in the database.

Neighborhood Resource Center
http://mauwi.wycokck.org/citizenaccess

This web site gives citizens access to a ton of data collected and stored by the Neighborhood Resource Center (NRC). This includes:
  • General Information (property information)
  • Code Enforcement (search for a code case)
  • Planning (search for a petition, plat submittal or plan review)
  • Building Permits (search for a building permit)
  • License (search for a business or rental license)
Here's the opening screen of the
Neighborhood Resource Center (NRC) data portal.
Although there is a Login box on the right,
you don't currently need to log in to get information.

SpotCrime
http://spotcrime.com/

This database isn't maintained by the Unified Government, but pulls data from local Police Departments (all jurisdictions).

According to Wikipedia, "SpotCrime.com is a Baltimore-based company founded in October 2007 and privately owned by ReportSee, Inc. It provides nationwide crime information about arrests, arsons, assaults, burglaries, robberies, shootings, thefts and vandalisms, on a Google map."

The reports are interesting, but are generally a week or two behind the current date. There are also apps for iOS and Android portable devices.

This map displays several days of police report data
around City Hall.

Transit (app)
http://thetransitapp.com

Here's a "third party" app that pulls freely available "open data" about transit schedules (busses, trains, etc.), then organizes and presents it in a useful way for transit riders. Transit currently works in 63 U.S. cities (including busses in the Kansas City metro area).


Until next time, have a great week!
~ Brian

bmckiernan@wycokck.org
- or -
Suggestion Box



Tuesday, April 8, 2014

The Circle of Life on Central Avenue

Here are a few more photos of Central Avenue from "back in the day". Where my earlier photos were mostly from the 1940s, these are mostly from the 1970s and 1980s. Thanks to the folks of Central Area Betterment Association for compiling and sharing these pictures.

Although CABA provided hundreds of cool photos, I have chosen ones that show buildings that are no longer in existence today to give you a perspective of what it looks like in the same spot today.

Those of you who have read this blog for a while have already heard my "Circle of Life" analogy for the growth and development of a city.

In every city, there are buildings and developments that are "born" (constructed) and grow up over time. Like everything else in our world, they age over the years and eventually both private business owners and city governments are faced with decisions on how to promote a new "revolution" on the circle of life.

Do we tear down those old buildings and build something new or do we try to preserve, renovate and repurpose them?

This can be a tricky decision as we do our best to figure out which buildings and developments are "old and historical" (and should be renovated) and which are "old and worn out" (and should be replaced). There are typically passionate advocates for both sides of the discussion. These photos show buildings where the decision was made to tear down and start over. In some cases, the replacement is complete. In other cases, we're in a holding pattern... still waiting for the next revolution of the circle of life.

(Click on any photo to enlarge it for better viewing.)

The northeast corner of 7th and Central.
The old buildings were torn down and this corner
is ready for redevelopment.
Hopefully, we'll be able to welcome new businesses soon.


The southwest corner of 7th and Central.
I'd completely forgotten about the Army & Navy Surplus store!
The circle of life has started a new revolution on this corner.
Although the historic buildings are gone, it's a very busy place!
Lots of folks visit the Conoco station along with
Krispy Kreme and Burritos to Go.


The southeast corner of 7th and Central.
Never was wild about "car carcasses" sitting on this corner.
Cancun Mexican Restaurant now occupies this corner. 


Here's a property at Central Avenue and Stinson Avenue.
It had a building on it in the 1940s,
but by the 1980s it was an unsightly vacant lot.
After some hard work by many dedicated folks,
Stinson Park was created and still exists today
as a nice little green space on Central Avenue.


The central city definitely suffered when the three hospitals
(Bethany, Providence and St. Margaret's) closed.
Here's an aerial view of the Bethany campus
north of Central between 11th and 12th Streets.
Bethany was a bustling place in its time.
Here's a close up.
That's Bethany Recreation Center in the right foreground.
The old Providence building now houses Donnelly College
and St. Margaret's is now home to the City View at St. Margaret's Lofts.
However, the Bethany building was razed
and we're still looking for a new development on the site.
That's the Bethany Medical Office Building in the right background.
It was built before the hospital was demolished and is still
a vital health care resource for local residents.


Here's the Flat Iron building that used to stand
on the southwest corner of 14th and Central.
A park was created after the building was razed.
You can see the old fire station at left (now home to CHWC).
On the right you can see part of the El Torito II complex
that features a wonderful grocery store along with a
great restaurant and bakery.


Chas Ball Super Market and 19th and Central.
Although it's now gone, too, this "modern" building
replaced older structures that used to sit on the site years earlier.
Another view of the Balls Super Market.
How many of you remember the theater that used to sit
where the long brick wall is in this picture?
Here's the site today.
The old Chas Ball building was demolished about six months ago
and the circle of life continues...


Although it technically didn't sit on Central Avenue,
I couldn't resist posting this photo of the motel
that used to sit north of the truck stop at 18th and I-70.
It was once a thriving business, but fell on hard times
and was razed to make way for Prescott Plaza. 
Believe it or not, this photo is taken from about
the same perspective as the motel photo above.
Quite a difference, eh?
Here are a couple more photos of Prescott Plaza.
We'll finish the circle of life here...
This Sunfresh Market at Prescott Plaza is the new location
for the Chas Ball Super Market the used to be at 19th and Central
(where there's now a new Auto Zone store).

Until next time, have a great week!

~ Brian

bmckiernan@wycokck.org
- or -
Suggestion Box



Monday, March 24, 2014

Citizen Survey Identifies Perceptions and Priorities

For the first time since 2000, the Unified Government of Wyandotte County / Kansas City, Kansas has completed a county-wide citizen survey to determine the perceptions of citizens about life in the city/county and to identify citizen priorities for focusing Unified Government effort, energy and resources.

At our strategic planning retreat in October 2013, Commissioner Angela Markley and I presented a countywide citizen survey as part of our suggested revisions to the UG's budget adoption calendar. The Mayor and the other Commissioners were unanimous in their agreement that it would be valuable for us to complete a survey, so we directed staff to "make it so".


The Unified Government contracted with ETC Institute of Olathe, Kansas to conduct the survey. ETC has a great reputation for conducting quality community surveys and they have surveyed citizens in over 300 cities across 46 states since 1998.

The survey was distributed by mail in February 2014 to a stratified random sample of households in Wyandotte County. A total of 1, 249 surveys were returned. ETC made sure that at least 150 surveys were received from each of the eight Commission districts. After tabulating the results, ETC is confident that the results of the survey represent the residents of the county both geographically and demographically.

ETC also told us that the margin of error is statistically very small and that the survey results give us a very good indication of what the citizens of Wyandotte County and Kansas City, Kansas are thinking as a group.

Summary Results
Here is a link to the PowerPoint summary report that was presented as part of our strategic planning session
I've pulled a few slides from the summary presentation of March 8 and included them here. I encourage you to click on the link above and the others listed below for a review of the entire survey and results.

The gentleman who presented the summary report to us in our strategic planning session summed up the overall results by saying, "You're doing better, but you have a ways to go".

Here's the summary slide he presented. (You can click on any of the slides below to display them larger so that you can read the small printing).


For example, under the heading of "You're doing better", here is a graph that shows overall satisfaction with services provided by the city of Kansas City Kansas. The lighter bars indicate responses gathered in the 2000 survey while the darker bars indicate the responses gathered in the 2014 survey. Regardless of the service provided, more people gave higher ratings in 2014 than in 2000.


Here are the positive ratings for overall quality of life and overall image of Kansas City, Kansas in 2014. Once again, more people responded favorably to quality-of-life and image in 2014 than in 2000.


So far so good, but here's where there is a tremendous advantage to having a company like ETC conduct our survey and compile the results. Since they conduct similar surveys in hundreds of other cities across the United States, we have the opportunity to compare ourselves to other cities of similar size.

When we do that, we understand that we still have "A ways to go".

In the two graphs below, the dark blue bars indicate the responses in the UG 2014 survey, while the red bars indicate the responses for all citizens surveyed in the Kansas City metro area and the yellow bars indicate the average responses for all cities surveyed across the United States.

We want our positive ratings to meet or exceed those of citizens in other cities, so we know we have work to do.




Lots of questions on the survey asked citizens to prioritize the areas where they think we should focus our attention and resources.

The next two graphs show the number of people who selected particular items as their first, second or third choice for us to focus on improving.

You'll see that the top three overall priorities for city services are "Quality of maintenance of city streets", "Quality of city police services", and "Quality of city code enforcement".


In terms of county services, the top three overall priorities are "Quality of motor vehicle registration", "Quality of aging services", "Quality of parks".



Detailed Results
There is much more detailed information about the survey on the Unified Government website if you'd like to go take a look.

Here are three links that will give you access to the very detailed final report along with maps and charts of responses by Commission Districts.

Where Do We Go From Here?
Our challenge now is to actually figure out how to capitalize on the strengths and improve the weaknesses identified in the survey. This will require effort and resources and a commitment from every one of us to get the job done. I believe we can do it and I look forward to the work!

Have a great week!
~ Brian

bmckiernan@wycokck.org
- or -
Suggestion Box


Monday, March 10, 2014

Streets and Sidewalks and Alleys (Oh, My!)

Let's talk infrastructure. No… really.

City infrastructure (i.e., streets, curbs, sidewalks, alleys, sewers, etc.) is something that is very important to citizens, but something that is usually boring to talk about (until you blow out a tire by hitting a pothole the size of the Grand Canyon).

After one of my recent posts featuring a 1916 postcard that showed a residential street in KCK, I got an email from someone who said something along the lines of, "Hey, I think I still have the same curb in front of my house. When do I get a new one?"

Ouch... very possibly true... but ouch.

So, let's talk infrastructure.



At the Commission Strategic Planning meeting last Saturday, we got the preliminary summary of results from the recently completed countywide citizen survey.

The survey is something that I have strongly advocated for since being elected and, this year, the Commission agreed to complete the survey as a component of strategic planning and the budget process.

I'll publish lots more information about the results of the survey in upcoming posts, but today we are going to continue talking about infrastructure.



The top priority for citizens completing the survey (regardless of Commission District) was improving the condition and maintenance of city streets. This was, by far, the top choice. The survey prompt just said "city streets", but I think it's a safe bet that people who responded to the survey were also thinking about curbs, sidewalks, alleys and sewers when they responded.

The results of this survey, then, strongly reinforce what many people have communicated to me directly… We need to wrap our brains around the challenge of maintaining our infrastructure in good working order and then create a plan to git 'r done.

KCK is not alone in needing to pay attention to infrastructure. In 2013, the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) gave the nation's infrastructure an overall grade of D. In its report, the ASCE emphasized that "America's critical infrastructure—principally, its roads, bridges, drinking water systems, mass transit systems, schools, and systems for delivering energy—may soon fail to meet society's needs." The ACSE estimates that $3.6 trillion needs to be invested in the nation's infrastructure by 2020.

Wow.



A few years ago, the citizens of Wyandotte County approved a 3/8 cent sales tax increase, with 1/3 of that revenue designated for infrastructure improvements.

Unfortunately, the amount of money generated by that special sales tax is less than a drop in the bucket when you consider all of the infrastructure that needs attention and how expensive it is to build, repair or replace.

If it will take $3.6 trillion nationwide, I wondered what kind of money we need to invest in the infrastructure in District 2. Since I'm a nerd and couldn't think of anything better to do on a Sunday afternoon, I gathered a stack of Google maps and used a ruler to plot and measure the linear miles of street within the District boundaries. I then made some assumptions and calculations to estimate the linear miles of curbs, sidewalks and alleys in addition.



Using those figures, and the average replacement cost for each different piece of infrastructure, I calculated two things: (1) what it would cost to replace everything that's broken right now and (2) what it would cost per year if we started and "annual plan" with the goal of replacing everything that's broken in 10 years.



Here are the assumptions and calculations for streets, curbs, sidewalks and alleys. The dollar figures in red represent how much money it would take to fix things now and the dollar figures and blue represent the money it would take to fund an "annual plan". If you don't want to wade through all the different pieces of infrastructure, just skip down to the "TOTALS" heading below.

Asphalt streets
83 miles (calculated "roughly" by hand from Google maps)
Calculations don't include "boundary streets" of 18th Street or State Avenue
Grind and overlay cost = $90,000 per mile (assume 2x12' lanes with no complications)

Total replacement cost for "grind and overlay" = $7,470,000 one time now
- OR -
Assume 25 year replacement cycle for "grind and overlay" = $298,800 per year

Curbs
Assume 75% of streets have curbs both sides = 125 miles of curb
Assume 50% of curbs need to be replaced = 63 miles of replacement
Replacement cost = $25,000 per 800 ft. (assume no complications)

Total replacement cost = $10,395,000 one time
- OR -
Ten year replacement project = 1,039,500 per year (for 10 years)

Sidewalks
Assume 66% of streets have sidewalks both sides = 110 miles of sidewalks
Assume 50% of those sidewalks need to be replaced = 55 miles of replacement
Replacement cost = $20,000 per 800 ft. (assume no complications)

Total replacement cost = $7,392,000 one time
- OR -
Ten year replacement project = $739,200 per year (for 10 years)

Alleys
Assume 66% of blocks (linear miles) have alleys = 55 miles of road
Assume that any linear mile of alley represents 2 linear miles of road = 28 miles of alley
Assume that all alleys need to be replaced = 28 miles of replacement
Replacement cost (roughly) = $15,000 per 800 ft. (assume no complications)

Total replacement cost = $2,772,000 one time
- OR -
Ten year replacement project = $277,200 per year (for 10 years)


= = TOTALS = =
Replace everything now (all asphalt and everything else that is "broken")
$28,029,000 one time

- OR -

Start "annual plan" (start 25 year cycle on asphalt replacement and replace everything else that is currently "broken" over a 10 year time frame)
$2,354,700 per year for 10 years

It would take an amount of money equivalent to about 1/10 of the entire UG budget to fix the broken infrastructure just in District 2!!!!! That's scary. And that's just for replacement, not for ongoing maintenance and repair!!

I haven't even considered sewers which is undoubtedly a messier calculation (pun intended), but they are probably way more expensive than anything else we've looked at here.  :-(

Frankly, it's a little disheartening to look at the size of those numbers and realize the amount of work we have ahead of us. But I believe we can confront this challenge and I believe we can succeed.

I'll post another article later this week with information on how we are already starting to chip away at our infrastructure replacement needs and how we can increase the rate of infrastructure repair.

As always, don't hesitate to let me know if you have thoughts, comments or suggestions on this or any other topic.

Have a great week!
~ Brian

bmckiernan@wycokck.org
- or -
Suggestion Box